This article is over 8 years old

Houston Matters

How Might Courts Rule Regarding the State’s Voter ID Law?

Last week, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Veasey v. Perry, a challenge to the Texas voter ID law. In a federal district court ruling, Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos ruled there was “compelling evidence” that Senate Bill 14, enacted in 2013, was passed with the intent to discriminate against minority […]

Share

Listen

To embed this piece of audio in your site, please use this code:

<iframe src="https://embed.hpm.io/1/212116" style="height: 115px; width: 100%;"></iframe>
X
Last week, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Veasey v. Perry, a challenge to the Texas voter ID law. In a federal district court ruling, Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos ruled there was "compelling evidence" that Senate Bill 14, enacted in 2013, was passed with the intent to discriminate against minority voters in Texas by requiring what opponents characterize as the nation's strictest voter ID law.

We talk about how the 5th Circuit is likely to rule, the history of voter ID laws and why a recent decision by the Supreme Court not to hear a similar case out of Wisconsin may signal that this Texas case is likely to find its way to the High Court, no matter what the 5th Circuit rules. Our guest is Josh Blackman, assistant professor of law at South Texas College of Law.

Michael Hagerty

Michael Hagerty

Senior Producer, Houston Matters

Michael Hagerty is the senior producer for Houston Matters. He's spent more than 20 years in public radio and television and dabbled in minor league baseball, spending four seasons as the public address announcer for the Reno Aces, the Triple-A affiliate of the Arizona Diamondbacks.

More Information