SCOTUS_REDISTRICTING_2_AS_TT

From left: State Rep. Rafael Anchia; Jose Garza, an attorney for the Mexican American Legislative Caucus; and Nina Perales, vice president of litigation for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, spoke on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on April 24, 2018. Their news conference came after arguments in Abbott v. Perez, a case over whether Texas’ congressional and state House maps were drawn with the intent to discriminate against Hispanic and black voters.

From left: State Rep. Rafael Anchia; Jose Garza, an attorney for the Mexican American Legislative Caucus; and Nina Perales, vice president of litigation for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, spoke on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on April 24, 2018. Their news conference came after arguments in Abbott v. Perez, a case over whether Texas' congressional and state House maps were drawn with the intent to discriminate against Hispanic and black voters.

Credit: Allison Shelley for The Texas Tribune

File Information:

  • File Type: image/jpeg
  • Width: 1250px
  • Height: 838px
  • File Size: 0.13MB

From the article: Texas Redistricting Case’s Oral Arguments At U.S. Supreme Court Focus On Jurisdiction Debate

From left: State Rep. Rafael Anchia; Jose Garza, an attorney for the Mexican American Legislative Caucus; and Nina Perales, vice president of litigation for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, spoke on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on April 24, 2018. Their news conference came after arguments in Abbott v. Perez, a case over whether Texas’ congressional and state House maps were drawn with the intent to discriminate against Hispanic and black voters.

Share