This article is over 9 years old


Court Of Inquiry Ends With Arrest Warrant For Anderson

Judge Louis Sturns ordered the arrest of former prosecutor Ken Anderson after ruling there was probable cause to believe he committed a felony by withholding critical evidence from defense lawyers in Michael Morton's 1987 trial.


GEORGETOWN — A judge issued an arrest warrant for former Williamson County District Attorney Ken Anderson on Friday, after finding probable cause to believe Anderson withheld critical evidence in Michael Morton’s 1987 murder trial.

Judge Louis Sturns concluded his court of inquiry by charging Anderson, who is now a state district judge, with tampering with government records (a misdemeanor), tampering with physical evidence (a felony) and failing to comply with a judge’s order to turn over such evidence, for which he could be held in “contempt of court.”

The rare court of inquiry, in which arguments were made in February, was held to determine whether Anderson, a former district attorney, committed criminal misconduct during the trial that led to Morton’s wrongful murder conviction. Morton, who was in attendance for Friday’s decision, spent nearly 25 years behind bars for his wife’s murder before he was exonerated.

Sturns said that Anderson purposefully concealed evidence from Morton’s defense attorneys, hiding reports that neighbors had seen a green van outside of the Mortons’ home and a phone transcript in which Morton’s son was said to have told his grandmother a “monster” murdered Morton’s wife.

Rusty Hardin, the special prosecutor in the court of inquiry, told reporters that Anderson would turn himself in at the Williamson County Jail on Friday afternoon, and that he would have to pay a $2,500 bond for each of three separate counts.

As for what happens next, Hardin admitted that nobody involved is sure. “We’re all kind of operating on a clean slate here,” he said, adding that Anderson would be “treated like anybody else.”

Sturns concluded that he did not have the authority to rule on the statute of limitations — he said that matter should be judged by a trial court. Anderson’s attorneys, who left before making any public comment Friday, said they would be filing an appeal.

Hardin added that the Anderson case did not signal widespread evidence of prosecutorial misconduct. “Most try to do it the right way,” he said.

Addressing reporters Friday, Morton thanked “everyone involved” and said, “I’m one of the only people who has a modest understanding of what Anderson is going through.” He said he hoped the legal system would be fair with Anderson. “The important thing is that there is transparency in our system, and accountability,” he said. “No one is above the law.”

Over five days in early February, Hardin and defense attorneys for Anderson had presented evidence regarding whether the former prosecutor had withheld critical evidence from Morton’s original trial attorneys. Earlier this week, both sides submitted briefs to the judge.

The evidence that Sturns determined was illegally withheld included a report in which neighbors told police a man in a green van had been parked near the Mortons’ home and a transcript of a phone conversation in which Morton’s mother-in-law, Rita Kirkpatrick, said that the couple’s 3-year-old son, Eric, said he saw a “monster” beat his mother. Anderson contends this phone conversation would not have been admissible in court — that the boy was too young to testify — and so there was no need to share it.

A blue bandana found near the Mortons’ home and tested for DNA linked Mark Alan Norwood to the murder, and last month he was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison. Norwood has also been charged with the 1988 murder of Debra Masters Baker in Austin.

During the court of inquiry, Anderson maintained he had done nothing wrong. “I’ve beaten myself up on what could have been done different,” he told the court, “and I frankly don’t know.”

Throughout the last few months, lawmakers have responded to the Morton story by considering bills that some say would improve prosecutor accountability. One of those is Senate Bill 825, by Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston, and passed by the Senate last month, would extend the statute of limitations for offenses involving the suppression of evidence by prosecutors.

Senate Bill 1611, by Sens. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, and Robert Duncan, R-Lubbock, which would explicitly require prosecutors to turn over evidence to defense lawyers in criminal cases. It passed in the Senate last week after much wrangling between defense attorneys and prosecutors, guided and encouraged by Morton and his lobbyist, Thomas Ratliff. It has been dubbed the Michael Morton Act.

Morton has praised both pieces of legislation, saying of Ellis’ bill, “Had this been in place when I was arrested, I probably wouldn’t have gone to prison.”

Ellis and Whitmire attended the court of inquiry’s conclusion Friday. Ellis reiterated calls for an innocence commission to investigate “every time the system makes a mistake” and someone is wrongfully convicted. “There ought to be probative questions asked every time,” he said.

Whitmire agreed, adding, “We shouldn’t be afraid of transparency and accountability.”


Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at







Today in Houston Newsletter Signup
We're in the process of transitioning services for our Today in Houston newsletter. If you'd like to sign up now, fill out the form below and we will add you as soon as we finish the transition. **Please note** If you are already signed up for the newsletter, you do not need to sign up again. Your subscription will be migrated over.