Closing Arguments Set for Eversole Bribery Trial

This is the first time in his 37-year career that defense attorney Rusty Hardin has rested a case without calling a single defense witness. He says prosecutors offered no evidence connecting the gifts with Eversole's official capacity. Professor Geoffrey Corn with the South Texas College of Law says Hardin is trying to demonstrate to the jury that his client has nothing to fear.

"If you don't present the defense, the message you're sending is extremely powerful, which is even considering everything the state offered, they haven't met their burden. There's just not enough proof here to conclude that the only rational explanation of this course of conduct was criminality."

Corn says it's a risk, but Hardin is hoping to downplay the weight of the prosecution's testimony.

"And it's like being a military commander, right? The greater risk you assume, the greater the potential reward."

The judge will have to instruct the jury that it cannot consider that the defendant wasn't asked to testify.

"And then Hardin gets up in closing argument, and he explains to them why he did it. You mark my words, that message will be conveyed loud and clear through Hardin's argument."

The trial has lasted more than two weeks. Eversole is accused of taking more than $100,000 in cash and gifts from developer Michael Surface in exchange for multi-million dollar county contracts. Ed Mayberry, KUHF News.

Tags: News

 

Share Options

Email